Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010)
Also, sorry for the big gap in my reviews. I know you’re at the edge of your seat wondering what’s going to happen to Harry.
If you thought shiz was going down in the last movie – just imagine the wizarding world without Dumbledore. No more Hogwarts feasts. No more Quidditch matches. Harry, Ron, and Hermione’s life at the wizarding school is a thing of the past, a fond memory to keep them going through the wilderness. They’re big kids now, in a big world. One can only hope that they learned enough to survive.
There’s a full-on war, here. Even the Ministry of Magic is taken over by Death Eaters early in the film. It’s up to Harry (and his pals) to off Voldemort… but it’s a little more difficult than just marching up to his front door and Avada-Kedavraing him (not that that’s even easy). Turns out Voldemort has taken every measure possible to ensure his immortality by splitting his soul seven times. These bits of his soul are stored in Horcruxes, little dark-magic objects that can only be destroyed with toys like goblin swords, or basilisk fangs. Annnd they have to destroy these before they can even THINK about killing the big V with no idea where they are or what they are. Dumbledore’s left behind a few clues for the teens to start on their quest… but that’s hardly enough to get ‘em rolling. So they spend a lot of time wandering around in forests and on cliff-sides pondering their options. Don’t worry, they only understand a little bit more than the audience does. Meanwhile, Harry catches wind that Voldy is searching for the Deathly Hallows, objects of power that date back to an old legend turned kids story. This is well explained in the film with an excellent, artistic animated scene.
I went and saw this at midnight when it was first released a year ago. Due to some slight confusion about assigned seating, I abandoned my post in the very front row to watch it on the stairs towards the top. Paying no heed to the parents’ disapproving looks to the fire hazard I had made myself, it was worth the stiff back. I saw it with three other friends, two of whom were hardly fond of the slower-paced take on the epic series. Like, I get it… but I don’t get it. Maybe it’s just because it follows the book so well. And, granted, the first half of the book isn’t as exciting as the second half either. So maybe that’s the only reason I liked it so much (it’s true, you don’t even want to try and watch this if you don’t know your HP trivia). But even with the “boring” bits, I feel like it’s hardly fair to say it’s a bad movie for that. I know the book back to front, and this captured the, well, boredom and claustrophobia – and I think that’s awesome! It’s moody, gritty, and emotional. So no, I don’t want to have the “boring” argument with you.
Whether it was luck or pure intuition, how fortunate was the Harry Potter series to have three kid actors grow into competent and attractive adults? Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and especially Emma Watson could not be better as the fearsome threesome. It’s too bad that Bonnie Wright as Ginny couldn’t amount to as much. Their emotional maturity is especially noticeable during the restless, unsuccessful hunts in the wilderness. With only one Horcrux found and no way to destroy it, their spirits are low and their tempers are high. Ron Weasley, a character that is never as fully developed in the books as Harry and Hermione are, has his moments of frustration, but more moments of growth. This, coupled with Half Blood Prince, is Grint’s best performance.
Watson got her character ages ago, and Radcliffe’s been there for a couple movies too.
The endless journey is important bonding time for the kid-heroes. Harry and Hermione, obviously, grow closer (and I, for one, adored the dancing scene). Their relationship is so tender, only tapping into romanticism. Through the thick and thin of Ron’s jealousy issues, they grow to be so united. With every other actor giving nothing more than cameo appearances, it was important to get that element right.
David Yates, who has had charge of the last two HP films, has the feel of these books down. You can tell that he actually read them. There stand Harry and Hermione at the foot of his parent’s graves on Christmas Day. The snow is falling in time to the tears that trickle down Harry’s face. The tender moment doesn’t last long though, before Hermione notices the creepy, cloaked woman spying on them. The following scene at Godric’s Hollow is so eery, and so deliciously spooky. Few words are spoken, the music speaks for itself. Once things started getting down and dirty and snakes were jumping out of cloaks, I think I literally bit my tongue through. Just like I did when I read that passage in the book. That’s what I call a good adaptation.
Also, the scenery is consistently breathtaking. Apparating is kinda like insta-hiking. You get to the best part first. It’s unfortunate that the kids can hardly appreciate the beauty surrounding them, their thoughts are with their loved ones who could, like, die. Understandable.
When things pick up, they pick up. The beginning chase and the concluding escape from Malfoy Manor are both exhilarating and visually stunning. These wizard duels are getting faster paced and much more swordsman-like. As for other characters… that Bellatrix (Helena Bonham Carter) is still a mean B, huh? Dobby (Toby Jones – sadly absent from every other movie except Chamber of Secrets) gets to be hero one last time with some seriously hard-nosed toughness, as well as heart-wrenching loyalty and goodness. Malfoy’s (Tom Felton) two seconds are forgettable. Alan Rickman had regrettably little to do, but that will be amended in the last installment. Ray Fiennes was excellent as always, he too with limited screen time.
I could have used a bit more Dumbledore-history, but that’s expendable information (though interesting). What matters to me is the feel of the film, and that perfectly imitated JK Rowling’s creation. 7/10